Notes on financial independence from a UK perspective — index funds, ISAs, and the parts of the plan that aren't about spreadsheets.

← All articles

One dashboard instead of three banks

personal-financeplanning

Three current accounts, a couple of savings pots, a pension platform, and one account I track by hand because it isn't the kind of thing that has an app. Seventeen accounts in total, across two actual banks and one that only exists in a spreadsheet. None of that was a plan. It's just what happens when accounts accumulate for perfectly good, boring reasons — a switching bonus here, a separate pot for one specific thing there — and nobody ever goes back and closes anything.

For a long time, knowing "how am I doing" meant opening two banking apps in turn, doing the mental addition myself, and then remembering the manual account existed at all, which I usually didn't. So I only checked properly when something had already gone wrong, or I was anxious enough to make myself sit down and do it — which is exactly backwards. The moment you most want an honest number is the moment you're least likely to have the patience to go and assemble one from three different places.

What actually changed

Everything now flows into one aggregator. Open one app, see one number, most mornings without really trying. The individual accounts still exist and still do their separate jobs — the switching-bonus account is still just sitting there being a switching-bonus account — but I no longer need to remember they exist in order to know where I stand.

Why this isn't the same as tracking everything

I've written a few posts now that go through a year of transactions in detail, and it would be reasonable to read this one as "and then I started watching my spending obsessively," which is close to the opposite of what actually happened. The risk register post already named the principle: a low-information diet, on the basis that more input doesn't produce better decisions, just more anxiety per decision. Aggregating accounts isn't about increasing the amount of financial information in my life. It's about reducing the effort required to get the one number that actually matters — total position — so that checking it stops being a production I put off and becomes a five-second habit I don't think about.

Those are different things. Watching every transaction land in real time would be more information and worse for me. Seeing one honest total without having to go and build it myself is less effort for a better habit. The aggregator makes the second one possible without accidentally becoming the first.

The part that isn't about the app at all

It doesn't especially matter which aggregator, or whether you use one at all, or what budgeting philosophy sits underneath it — envelopes, zero-based, nothing at all. The actual point is KISS, the same principle from the risk register post: complexity is a cost you pay in attention every year, forever, and "I have to open three apps and do arithmetic to know how I'm doing" is complexity you didn't choose, it just accumulated. Collapsing it back down to one number, one glance, is the whole win. Everything else is implementation detail.


Not financial advice — I'm not qualified to give any, and this one's really just a note on tools rather than money.